| Background
Summary and Questions
In the early 1970s, the medical school of the University of California at Davis
devised a dual admissions program to increase representation of
"disadvantaged" students. Under the regular admissions procedure, a screening
process was used to evaluate candidates for further consideration. Candidates
whose overall undergraduate grade point averages fell below 2.5 on a scale of
4.0 were automatically rejected. Of the remaining candidates, some were
selected for interviews. Following an interview, the admissions committee rated
candidates who survived the screening process on a scale of 1 to 100. The rating
considered the interviewer's evaluation, the candidate's overall and science
grade point averages, scores on the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT),
letters of recommendation, extracurricular activities, and other biographical data.
The ratings were added together to arrive at each candidate's "benchmark
score."
On the application form, candidates could indicate that they were members of a
"minority group," which the medical school designated as "Blacks," "Chicanos,"
"American Indians," or "Asians." Candidates could also choose to be considered
"economically and/or educationally disadvantaged." The applications of those
who did so were sent to the special admissions committee, where applications
were screened to determine whether the candidate met the criteria established
for disadvantaged and minority groups. These applicants did not have to meet
the 2.5 grade point average cut off used in the regular program, nor were the
candidates in the special admissions program compared to the candidates in the
regular admissions program. Of the 100 spots in the medical school, 16 spaces
were set aside for this program.
From 1971 to 1974 the special program resulted in the admission of 21 black
students, 30 Mexican Americans, and 12 Asians, for a total of 63 minority
students.* During the same period, the regular admissions program admitted 1
black student, 6 Mexican Americans, and 37 Asians, for a total of 44 minority
students. No disadvantaged white candidates received admission through the
special program.
Allan Bakke was a white male who applied to and was rejected from the regular
admissions program in 1973 and 1974. During those same years, minority
applicants with lower grade point averages, MCAT scores, and benchmark
scores were admitted to the medical school under the special program.
After his second rejection, Bakke filed suit in the Superior Court of Yolo County,
California. He sought to compel the University of California at Davis to admit him
to the medical school. He also alleged that the special admissions program
violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because it excluded him on the basis of race.
The Superior Court of Yolo County, California found that the special admissions
program did violate the federal and state constitutions, as well as Title VI, and
was therefore illegal. The Court declared that race could not be taken into
account when making admissions decisions. However the Court also ruled that
Bakke should not be admitted to the medical school because he failed to show
that he would have been admitted in the absence of the special admissions
program.
The University of California appealed the case to the Supreme Court of California,
which also declared the special admissions policy unconstitutional. Furthermore,
the Supreme Court of California determined that Bakke should be admitted to the
school because the University failed to demonstrate that Bakke would not have
been admitted without the special admissions program.
The Regents of the University of California then appealed the case to the
Supreme Court of the United States.
*Note: These were the racial classifications used by the University of California at Davis at the time.
Questions to Consider:
- Why might a college or university want to consider race as a factor in the
admissions process? Do you think it is appropriate for a college or university
to do so? Why or why not?
-
On what point did both the California Superior and California Supreme Courts
agree in their Bakke rulings?
-
Do you agree with the lower courts' decisions? Why or why not?
|