Korematsu v. United States (1944)

Sample Scored Discussion Narrative Rubric

EXEMPLARY EFFECTIVE ADEQUATE MINIMAL UNSATISFACTORY

The students have accurately expressed considerable knowledge pertinent to the discussion question/issue. In addition, students have used a variety of skills, both behaviorial and knowledge-based, to advance the discussion. The students were always civil, listened intently, showed no sign of negative behaviors and participated frequently given the time allowed.

The students have accurately expressed knowledge pertinent to the discussion question/issue. The students used a variety of skills, both behavioural and knowledge-based to advance the discussion. The number and variety of skills employed shows room for improvement given the time allowed. The students were always civil, and listened intently, though may have showed some signs of less serious negative behaviors such as interrupting. The frequency of participation may need improvement.

The students have accurately expressed some knowledge pertinent to the discussion question/issue. The students used some skills to advance the discussion, but the skills may have been predominantly knowledge-based OR behavioural. The number and variety of skills employed shows considerable room for improvement given the time allowed. The students were always civil, though may have showed some signs of less serious negative behaviors such as interrupting. The students may have also shown signs of not listening. The frequency of participation shows considerable room for improvement.

The students have accurately expressed some knowledge pertinent to the discussion question/issue. However, there may have been a large number of inaccurate statements made that show a lack of preparation for the discussion. The students showed minimal signs of skills to advance the discussion. There is considerable room to improve the frequency and quality of participation. The students may have shown signs of uncivil behavior that disrupted the discussion, such as very disruptive interrupting, or criticizing people instead of ideas. The students may have shown signs of not listening intently.

The students have failed to express any relevant knowledge on the discussion question/issue. The students have also demonstrated few if any skills to further the discussion.

Resources

About landmarkcases.org
 
Teaching Recommendations
Based on Your Time

 
Background Summary
and Questions

• • •
Reading Level
• •
Reading Level
 •
Reading Level
 
Diagram of How the Case Moved Through the Court System
Key Excerpts from the Majority Opinion
Key Excerpts from the Dissenting Opinion
Full Text of the Majority Opinion

back to top

Activities
    The Case

Classifying Arguments

Primary Documents: Executive Order 9066

A Question of Loyalty
Presidential Powers in Wartime: Standard level activity
Presidential Powers in Wartime: AP level activity
Cartoon Analysis

back to top

    After the Case

Did the Court Err in Korematsu
Cases in the War Against Terrorism
Fred Korematsu's Obituary


back to top

 
Additional Resources
Densho: the Japanese American Legacy
Exploring the Japanese American Internment
Virtual Museum of San Francisco: Internment of the Japanese

back to top

Back to top


  FindLaw  
 

LEGAL WEB AND DATABASE SEARCH