A flier reading "instructions to all persons of Japanese ancestry living in the following area."

Korematsu v. United States (1944)

Japanese American Internment During World War II was Constitutional

Exclusion Order posted at First and Front Streets directing removal of persons of Japanese ancestry from the first San Francisco section to be effected by the evacuation.

Photo Credit: Dorothea Lange, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Korematsu v. United States (1944)

Japanese American Internment During World War II was Constitutional

Overview

After Pearl Harbor was bombed in December 1941, the military feared a Japanese attack on the U.S. mainland. The U.S. government was worried that Americans of Japanese descent might aid the enemy. In 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed an executive order forcing many people of Japanese descent living on the West Coast to leave their homes and businesses and live in internment camps for the duration of the war. Fred Korematsu, an American citizen of Japanese descent, was arrested and convicted of violating the executive order. Korematsu did not believe his arrest was fair. He challenged his conviction in the courts saying that Congress, the president, and the military authorities did not have the power to issue the relocation orders, and that he was being discriminated against based on his race. The government argued that the evacuation was necessary to protect national security. The federal Appeals Court agreed with the government. Korematsu appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court agreed with government and stated that the need to protect the country was a greater priority than the individual rights of the people of Japanese descent forced into internment camps.

A flier reading "instructions to all persons of Japanese ancestry living in the following area."

Exclusion Order posted at First and Front Streets directing removal of persons of Japanese ancestry from the first San Francisco section to be effected by the evacuation.

Photo Credit: Dorothea Lange, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

"Citizenship has its responsibilities as well as its privileges, and in time of war the burden is always heavier. Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direst emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. But when under conditions of modern warfare our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger."

- Justice Black, speaking for the majority

Learning About Korematsu v. United States

Students

This section is for students. Use the links below to download classroom-ready .PDFs of case resources and activities.

About the Case

Full Case Summaries

A thorough summary of case facts, issues, relevant constitutional provisions/statutes/precedents, arguments for each side, decision, and case impact.

Case Background and Vocabulary

Learning Activities

Teachers

Use the links below to access:

  • student versions of the activities in .PDF and Word formats
  • how to differentiate and adapt the materials
  • how to scaffold the activities
  • how to extend the activities
  • technology suggestions
  • answers to select activities

(Learn more about Street Law's commitment and approach to a quality curriculum.)

About the Case

Learning Activities

Teacher Resources

Planning Time and Activities

If you have ONE day...

If you have TWO days...

If you have THREE days...

If you have FOUR days...

Glossary

These are terms you will encounter during your study of Korematsu v. United States. View all Glossary terms here.

Legal Concepts

These are legal concepts seen in Korematsu v. United States. Click a legal concept for an explanation and a list of other cases where it can be seen. View all Legal Concepts here.