A mugshot of Mapp.

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

Illegally Obtained Evidence is Inadmissible in State Courts

1957 mug shots of Dollree Mapp

Photo Credit: Photo by the Cleveland Press from the Cleveland Press Collections, courtesy of the Michael Schwartz Library Special Collections, Cleveland State University

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

Illegally Obtained Evidence is Inadmissible in State Courts

Overview

Suspicious that Dollree Mapp might be hiding a person suspected in a bombing, the police demanded entrance to her home. Mapp refused to let them in because they did not have a warrant. The police later forced their way into her house. They were holding up a piece of paper, but when Mapp demanded to see their search warrant, they would not show it to her. As a result of their search, the police found a trunk containing pornographic materials. They arrested Mapp and charged her with violating an Ohio law against the possession of obscene materials. She was found guilty in court and sentenced to jail. After losing an appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court, Mapp took her case to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court determined that evidence obtained through a search that violates the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in state courts.

A mugshot of Mapp.

1957 mug shots of Dollree Mapp

Photo Credit: Photo by the Cleveland Press from the Cleveland Press Collections, courtesy of the Michael Schwartz Library Special Collections, Cleveland State University

". . . our holding that the exclusionary rule is an essential part of both the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments is not only the logical dictate of prior cases, but it also makes very good sense. There is no war between the Constitution and common sense."

- Justice Thomas Clark, speaking for the majority

Learning About Mapp v. Ohio

Teachers

Use the links below to access:

  • student versions of the activities in .PDF and Word formats
  • how to differentiate and adapt the materials
  • how to scaffold the activities
  • how to extend the activities
  • technology suggestions
  • answers to select activities

(Learn more about Street Law's commitment and approach to a quality curriculum.)

About the Case

Learning Activities

Teacher Resources

Planning Time and Activities

If you have ONE day...

If you have TWO days...

If you have THREE days...

Note to teachers: We recommend that you invite a community resources person, such as a police officer, judge, or lawyer, to assist in the activities described here for day three. Many of the scenarios are tricky and the answers can depend upon the nuances of state law.

If you have FOUR days...

Glossary

These are terms you will encounter during your study of Mapp v. Ohio. View all Glossary terms here.

Legal Concepts

These are legal concepts seen in Mapp v. Ohio. Click a legal concept for an explanation and a list of other cases where it can be seen. View all Legal Concepts here.